The plural, impure or discordant nature of time has become an important theme in recent critical social and political theory. Against Althusser’s dismissal of Sartre’s presumedly Hegelian understanding of time and history, this article establishes Jean-Paul Sartre as a key figure in this debate on the plurality of temporalities. Especially in the Critique of Dialectical Reason, Sartre understands history and the social in terms of a multiplicity of uneven and non-synchronous temporalisations, rejecting an notion of time as a universal container within which events take place. The originality of Sartre’s approach is that it establishes a link between the notion of the plurality of temporalities and the problem of freedom and domination. His mature social and political theory allows us to understand temporalisation as a strategy for domination, and objective social temporality (e.g. the time of the economy or of machine systems) as key to a form of anonymous or structural domination. A reconstruction of this highly complex and sophisticated approach to thinking domination through time can also shed an original light on the temporal dimension of democracy and totalitarianism.

时间的多元性，不纯性或不和谐性已成为最近批判性社会和政治理论的重要主题。反对阿尔都塞（Althusser）解雇萨特（Sartre）大概是黑格尔对时间和历史的理解，本文将让·保罗·萨特（Jean-Paul Sartre）确立为这场关于多重时间性的辩论的关键人物。特别是在辩证理性批判中，萨特（Sartre）通过多种不均匀和非同步的时间化方式来理解历史和社会，拒绝将时间这一概念视为发生事件的通用容器。萨特的方法的独创性在于，它在多个时间性的概念与自由与统治问题之间建立了联系。他成熟的社会和政治理论使我们能够理解暂时性是一种统治策略，而客观的社会暂时性（例如，经济或机器系统的时代）则是匿名或结构性统治形式的关键。对这种高度复杂，复杂的思维方式进行时间重构的重构，也可以为民主和极权主义的时空维度提供最初的启示。