The movement toward open-science is multifaceted with the general goal to promote both better scientific practices and greater access to scientific information. One aspect of the open-science framework is the recommended use of registered reports replacing the legacy model that dictates research manuscripts are submitted for initial review only after the completion of the study and the development of a full manuscript. At the time of this conversation, 125 journals were participating in the initiative to accept registered reports. At the completion of the conversation, that number had increased to 130. The majority of those journals are in the fields of psychology and medicine. Gifted Child Quarterly and the Journal of Advanced Academics were among the first education journals to open their editorial policies to accept and encourage registered report research. Matthew McBee and Scott Peters have consistently advocated for this movement toward registered reports and open science in gifted education and advanced academic research. This interview shares their rationale for the movement toward registered reports and the potential benefits to research in the fields of gifted education and advanced academics.

中文翻译：

---

进行注册报告研究：与 Matthew McBee 和 Scott Peters 的对话

走向开放科学的运动是多方面的，其总体目标是促进更好的科学实践和更多地获取科学信息。开放科学框架的一个方面是推荐使用注册报告取代传统模型，该模型规定研究手稿仅在研究完成并开发完整手稿后才提交进行初步审查。在这次谈话时，有 125 家期刊参与了接受注册报告的倡议。谈话结束时，这个数字已经增加到 130 个。这些期刊中的大多数是心理学和医学领域的。《天才儿童季刊》和《高级学术期刊》是首批开放其编辑政策以接受和鼓励注册报告研究的教育期刊。Matthew McBee 和 Scott Peters 一直倡导在天才教育和高级学术研究中向注册报告和开放科学方向发展。这次采访分享了他们转向注册报告的基本原理，以及在天才教育和高级学者领域进行研究的潜在好处。