Reforms in higher education according to new public management (NPM) have led to so-called managerial universities, which place a stronger focus on effectiveness and efficiency, causing profound changes in related organizational structures, which in turn must support target attainment to achieve organizational effectiveness. An overview of research shows that the organizational effectiveness of faculties has hardly been investigated so far. Moreover, there are no effectiveness criteria for the organization of faculties, post-reform. The present article aims to identify effectiveness criteria for the organization of faculties. Guided interviews were conducted with 16 experts from different universities working in faculty management. Both open and specific questions about the general criteria of effectiveness, as derived from the literature, were used. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The results show continuity, trust, transparency and relief as inductively identified criteria. Communication and information supply, environmental orientation, decision-making quality and motivation were confirmed as effectiveness criteria from the literature.

中文翻译：

---

大学的行为不同：确定教师的组织有效性标准

根据新公共管理（NPM）的高等教育改革导致所谓的管理型大学更加注重有效性和效率，导致相关组织结构发生深刻变化，反过来又必须支持目标实现以实现组织有效性. 研究综述表明，迄今为止，几乎没有人研究过教师的组织有效性。此外，改革后的教职工组织没有有效性标准。本文旨在确定教师组织的有效性标准。对来自不同大学的 16 位从事教师管理工作的专家进行了引导式访谈。从文献中得出的关于有效性的一般标准的公开和具体问题，被使用。使用定性内容分析对访谈进行转录和分析。结果显示连续性、信任、透明度和救济是归纳确定的标准。沟通和信息供应、环境导向、决策质量和动机被确认为文献中的有效性标准。