AbstractThis paper addresses the design of the machinery of collective bargaining from the perspective of microeconomic and macroeconomic flexibility. In the former context, somewhat greater attention is given over to enterprise flexibility than external adjustment. In the latter context, close attention is also paid to changes in collective bargaining along the dimensions of bargaining coverage, structure, and coordination. Support is adduced for the German, contemporary Scandinavian, and British models. The role of trust in securing micro and macro flexibility also receives attention, suggesting that the polder or Dutch model might also be expected to populate the firmament of fit-for-purpose collective bargaining arrangements. JEL Classification: Microeconomics/Institutions (D02), Institutions and the Macroeconomy (E02), Employment/Unemployment/Wages (E24), Income Distribution (E25), Macroeconomic Policy Objectives (E61), Labor Economics Policies (JO8) Trades Unions (J51), Collective Bargaining (J52), Labor-Management Relations (J53), Public Policy (J58), Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems (P51)

中文翻译：

---

集体谈判制度以及宏观经济和微观经济的灵活性：发达经济体对适当体制形式的追求

摘要本文从微观经济和宏观经济灵活性的角度探讨了集体谈判机制的设计。在前一种情况下，与外部调整相比，更多地关注企业灵活性。在后一种情况下，还要密切注意集体谈判沿谈判范围，结构和协调维度的变化。为德国，当代的斯堪的纳维亚和英国型号提供了支持。信任在确保微观和宏观灵活性方面的作用也受到关注，这表明田或荷兰模式也有望成为适合目的的集体谈判安排的坚强基础。JEL分类：微观经济学/制度（D02），制度和宏观经济（E02），