The lack of inclusive, accessible housing that meets the needs of people with physical and cognitive disability is a global issue. The inadequacy of inclusive housing development is partly a result of divergent priorities and poor coordination between housing, health, and disability sector stakeholders—public and private developers, designers, architects, occupational therapists, and disability service organizations. This paper provides findings from an Australian Research Council funded study where the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was utilized to compare and contrast inclusive housing development priorities among relevant stakeholders. A multistage process was undertaken to ascertain the AHP criteria for inclusive housing development decisions, including a systematic review of peer‐reviewed and grey literature, in addition to a structured focus group with end users (n = 17) and an industry stakeholder online survey (n = 130). Finally, a subgroup of industry stakeholders (n = 29) representing the housing, health, and disability sectors completed the AHP to establish decision priorities. The final AHP model indicated three broad clusters of decision priorities for inclusive accessible housing development: end‐user connectedness, building considerations, and feasibility, respectively. Global weights conclude that specific end‐user connectedness elements, namely, “access to health care,” “community engagement,” “proximity to transport,” and “security and safety,” were the foremost priorities. It is expected that inclusive housing development decisions that integrate the connectedness of end users first and foremost, with building and feasibility priorities, will favourably impact the housing opportunities and choices for people with disability.

中文翻译：

---

包容性无障碍住房的利益相关者优先事项：系统审查和多标准决策分析

缺乏能够满足肢体和认知障碍者需求的包容性和无障碍住房是一个全球性问题。包容性住房发展的不足部分是由于住房，卫生和残疾人部门的利益相关者（公共和私人开发商，设计师，建筑师，职业治疗师和残疾人服务组织）之间的优先重点不一致以及协调不力造成的。本文提供了澳大利亚研究委员会资助的一项研究的结果，在该研究中，层次分析层次法（AHP）用于比较和对比相关利益相关者的包容性住房发展优先事项。为了确定包容性住房开发决策的AHP标准，我们采取了多阶段流程，其中包括对同行评审的灰色文献进行系统的审查，除了具有最终用户的结构化焦点小组（n = 17）和行业利益相关者在线调查（n = 130）。最后，代表住房，卫生和残疾人行业的行业利益相关者小组（n = 29）完成了AHP，以制定决策优先级。最终的AHP模型指出了包容性无障碍住房开发的三大决策优先级群：最终用户连通性，建筑考虑因素和可行性。全球权重得出结论，特定的最终用户连接要素，即“获得医疗保健”，“社区参与”，“交通便利”和“安全与保障”是首要任务。预计包容性住房开发决定应首先将最终用户的联系与建筑和可行性优先事项结合起来，