Past research supports the notion that Fox News Channel (FNC) is more dismissive of global warming than other news outlets. In addition, FNC covers the issue much more often. A qualitative–quantitative content analysis indicates that—for the leading U.S. broadcast and cable news networks overall—coverage of global warming relies on traditional news values such as political-elite cues and event magnitude. FNC, however, exhibited a news agenda favoring more coverage of global warming and climate change (relative to the other leading news outlets). Additional analysis indicates that FNC often co-opts the issue as an exemplar of “political correctness” and of the excess of political progressivism. Other networks, conversely, are more likely than FNC to cover the actual causes and impacts of global warming. Findings are situated in the context of gatekeeping theory; implications of observed network differences are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

多即少

过去的研究支持这样一种观点，即福克斯新闻频道 (FNC) 比其他新闻媒体对全球变暖更不屑一顾。此外，FNC 更频繁地报道这个问题。一项定性定量内容分析表明，对于美国领先的广播和有线新闻网络整体而言，全球变暖的报道依赖于传统的新闻价值，例如政治精英线索和事件规模。然而，FNC 展示了一个新闻议程，有利于更多地报道全球变暖和气候变化（相对于其他主要新闻媒体）。进一步的分析表明，FNC 经常将这个问题作为“政治正确”和过度政治进步主义的一个例子。相反，其他网络比 FNC 更有可能涵盖全球变暖的实际原因和影响。调查结果位于守门理论的背景下；讨论了观察到的网络差异的影响。