Abstract The article elaborates how Turkey’s relations with Syria, which have been pursued by varying foreign policy instruments and conduct, have greatly affected Turkey’s standing on the Middle East during the 2000s. By employing the relevant concepts, “regional power” and “third party intervention” in the literature, the article aims to explain the changes caused by the Syrian conflict in the AKP’s (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi—the Justice and Development Party) foreign policy in a better frame. After the Syrian conflict, Turkey’s increasing intervention in Syria including use of force resulted in a new power projection other than soft power in its regional relations. Neighboring a civil war state caused Ankara to organize its relations with Syria and the Middle East in a new context which requires new mechanisms, new partnerships, and new interpretations in the face of rising nongovernmental armed groups, refugee flows, changing regional alignments, and diverging interests with its major Western allies.

中文翻译：

---

地区权力角色和干预：2000 年代土耳其在叙利亚的案例

摘要 本文阐述了土耳其与叙利亚的关系如何通过不同的外交政策工具和行为来追求，在 2000 年代极大地影响了土耳其在中东的地位。本文旨在通过文献中的相关概念“地区权力”和“第三方干预”来解释叙利亚冲突对正义与发展党（Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi——正义与发展党）外交政策造成的变化。更好的框架。叙利亚冲突后，土耳其对叙利亚的干预越来越多，包括使用武力，导致其地区关系出现了软实力之外的新力量投射。邻国内战导致安卡拉在新的背景下组织与叙利亚和中东的关系，这需要新的机制、新的伙伴关系、