当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Journal of Criminal Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Expert Shopping’: Appeals Adducing Fresh Evidence in Diminished Responsibility Cases: R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270
The Journal of Criminal Law ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-04-20 , DOI: 10.1177/0022018320921053
Mark Thomas

Section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act (CAA) 1968 provides the framework for the admission of fresh evidence in criminal appeals in the Court of Appeal. The overarching consideration in whether the Court should permit such evidence to be formally admitted into evidence is by reference to what is ‘necessary or expedient in the interests of justice’ (s 23(1)). By s 23(2), the Court is required to take the following four matters, among other relevant considerations, into account:

中文翻译:

“专家购物”:在减少责任案件中提出新证据的上诉:R v Foy [2020] EWCA Crim 270

1968 年刑事上诉法 (CAA) 第 23 条为上诉法院在刑事上诉中采纳新证据提供了框架。法院是否应允许此类证据被正式接纳为证据的首要考虑是参考什么是“为了正义的利益所必需的或适宜的”(第 23(1) 条)。根据第 23(2) 条,法院必须考虑以下四项事项,其中包括其他相关考虑因素:
更新日期:2020-04-20
down
wechat
bug