Rachel Ormston, Professor James Chalmers, Professor Fiona Leverick, Professor Vanessa Munro, Lorraine Murray, Scottish Jury Research: Findings From A Large-Scale Mock Jury Study (Scottish Government, October 2019), https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-jury-research-fingings-largemock-jury-study-2/ This important study was commissioned by the Scottish government to better appreciate (a) how “the unique features of the Scottish jury system [affect] jury reasoning and jury decision making”; and (b) how jurors make sense of the “not proven” verdict’, and choose between that verdict as opposed to others. This is the largest mock jury study ever conducted in the United Kingdom, as may well be the most realistic. The key “overarching” finding is that the way in which the jury system is “constructed” makes an important difference to jury verdicts.

中文翻译：

---

公告栏

Rachel Ormston、James Chalmers 教授、Fiona Leverick 教授、Vanessa Munro 教授、Lorraine Murray，苏格兰陪审团研究：大规模模拟陪审团研究的结果（苏格兰政府，2019 年 10 月），https://www.gov.scot/publications /scottish-jury-research-fingings-largemock-jury-study-2/ 这项重要研究受苏格兰政府委托，旨在更好地了解 (a) “苏格兰陪审团制度的独特之处 [影响] 陪审团推理和陪审团决定制作”; (b) 陪审员如何理解“未经证实”的裁决，并在该裁决与其他裁决之间做出选择。这是英国有史以来最大的模拟陪审团研究，也可能是最现实的。关键的“总体”发现是，陪审团制度的“构建”方式对陪审团裁决有重要影响。