Nationalism in India arose out of resistance to colonialism and thus had a different character than the bourgeois nationalism of European countries after the treaty of Westphalia. The inclusive nature of Indian nationalism has been eroded, however, as a big corporate sector has grown in the economy and the Hindutva ideology has grown alongside it. What has now happened is an alliance between the two forces, the ‘neo-liberal’ regime in the economy having its counterpart in a ruling semi-fascist ideology. The latter presents the Hindus as a homogenous whole, whose dominance, it aims at establishing. In reality, it serves the interests of the corporate-financial oligarchy, and so is adverse to the well-being of the vast majority of India’s population.

中文翻译：

---

印度公司-金融寡头的意识形态-笔记

印度的民族主义是出于对殖民主义的抵制而产生的，因此其性质与《威斯特伐利亚条约》签订后的欧洲国家的资产阶级民族主义不同。但是，随着经济中大型公司的发展以及印度教思想的发展，印度民族主义的包容性已经受到侵蚀。现在发生的事情是两股力量之间的联盟，经济中的“新自由主义”政权在统治半法西斯主义的思想中处于对立状态。后者将印度教徒视为一个同质的整体，旨在确立其统治地位。实际上，这符合公司金融寡头的利益，因此不利于印度绝大多数人口的福祉。