To examine the intersection of trans-identities and collegiate recreation program and services (CRS), this inquiry explored the perceived meanings and implications of gender-related competitive sport policy as interpreted by transgender students. Three trans-identifying students (n = 3) participated in this inquiry; each student reviewed collegiate recreation competitive sport policy excerpts and provided qualitative responses during phenomenological, semi-structured interviews. The resulting transcripts underwent a two-part, cyclical analysis to identify and explore common themes and phenomenological essence. Conclusionary themes indicated that CRS competitive sport policy—while possibly having the intent to be gender inclusive—may not be conclusively perceived as such. In addition, select—yet common—terminology used in CRS lexicon was perceived as being exclusive to trans-identities. These themes suggest that CRS trans-inclusive policy should consider the reception of its content during development and furthermore address a gap in literature by providing practitioners with insight as to the manner of which CRS policy is being perceived by their intended trans-audiences.

为了研究跨身份认同和大学娱乐计划与服务（CRS）的交叉点，本次调查探索了跨性别学生解释的与性别相关的竞技体育政策的感知意义和含义。三个反身学生（n= 3）参与了该查询；每位学生在现象学，半结构化访谈中都审查了大学娱乐休闲运动政策摘录，并提供了定性的回答。产生的成绩单经过两部分的周期性分析，以识别和探索共同的主题和现象学本质。结论性主题表明，CRS竞技体育政策（尽管可能意图将性别平等纳入其中）可能并不能因此而被最终确定。另外，在CRS词典中使用的选择（至今）通用术语被认为是唯一的跨身份标识。