当前位置: X-MOL 学术Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Does Greater Creditor Protection Affect Firm Borrowings? Evidence from IBC
Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-28 , DOI: 10.1177/0973801020904484
Jibin Jose 1 , Snehal S. Herwadkar 2 , Prabal Bilantu 3 , Shihas Abdul Razak 4
Affiliation  

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in India ushered in a new era of creditor-in-control regime with an in-built mechanism for time-bound resolution. This article examines the impact of the Code on firm borrowings and cost of funds. Using firm-level data on 4,531 firms for the period 2012–2018, we find that implementation of IBC has had many desirable consequences from a policy perspective. It helped in deleveraging of firms as their reliance on borrowings—whether long-term or short-term—declined. Further analysis suggests that this is especially true for weak and large firms. The stronger creditor protection is, thus, a step in the direction of reducing the burden on banks and further market deepening.

JEL Classification: G32, G33, G38, D22, O16



中文翻译:

更高的债权人保护会影响公司借款吗?来自IBC的证据

印度的《破产与破产法》(IBC)引入了内置的限时解决机制,开创了债权人控制制度的新纪元。本文研究了该准则对公司借款和资金成本的影响。使用2012-2018年间4,531家公司的公司级数据,我们发现,从政策角度来看,IBC的实施产生了许多可喜的后果。由于企业对借款的依赖(长期或短期)下降,这有助于减少企业的去杠杆化。进一步的分析表明,这对于弱企业和大企业而言尤其如此。因此,加强债权人保护是朝减轻银行负担和进一步深化市场迈出的一步。

JEL分类: G32,G33,G38,D22,O16

更新日期:2020-05-28
down
wechat
bug