Following a veto of a prescriptive authority (RxP) bill in Oregon, 397 of 743 randomly selected psychologists were surveyed online regarding their attitudes and knowledge. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (n = 203) or education (n = 194) condition. After being exposed to information regarding access, training, and legislation, education participants completed post-test measures. Evidence supporting proponents’ argument of improved access was not forthcoming. There was a division about scope expansion (43% support, 32% opposed, 25% undecided). Respondents’ knowledge of RxP was minimal, but education increased knowledge. Views were more stable, with attitudes shifting only in targeted areas. Using a “cultural cognition” framework, the discussion centers on exploring the need to evaluate RxP and use this information to educate psychologists about this issue.

中文翻译：

---

俄勒冈州心理学家对规范性权威的看法和了解：意见分歧和数据驱动的变化

在俄勒冈州否决了一项规范性授权 (RxP) 法案后，随机选择的 743 名心理学家中有 397 名接受了在线调查，了解他们的态度和知识。参与者被随机分配到控制 (n = 203) 或教育 (n = 194) 条件。在接触到有关访问、培训和立法的信息后，教育参与者完成了测试后措施。支持支持者关于改善访问的论点的证据并未出现。关于范围扩展存在分歧（43% 支持，32% 反对，25% 未决定）。受访者对 RxP 的了解很少，但教育增加了知识。观点更加稳定，态度仅在目标领域发生转变。使用“文化认知”框架，