Abstract In Natural propositions (2014), Stjernfelt contends that the interpretation of a proposition or dicisign requires the joint action of two kinds of signs. A proposition must contain a sign that conveys a general quality. This function can be served by a similarity-based icon or code-based symbol. In addition, a proposition must situate or apply this general quality, so that the predication can become liable of being true or false. This function is served by an index. Stjernfelt rightly considers the co-localization of these two parts to be a primitive phenomenon. Although this primitive character would seem to bar any further analysis, I endeavor to clarify the degree of proximity sufficient to enable co-localization. Siding with Pietarinen (2014), who argues that the whole issue should not be construed in metric terms, I conclude that one cannot make sense of propositional co-localization without appealing to some form of first-person perspective.

中文翻译：

---

______对于解释一个命题是必要的

摘要Stjernfelt在《自然命题》（2014年）中主张，命题或双数字的解释需要两种符号的共同作用。命题必须包含传达一般品质的符号。该功能可以由基于相似度的图标或基于代码的符号来实现。另外，命题必须置于或采用这种一般性质，以便该谓词可以成为真假。此功能由索引提供。Stjernfelt正确地认为这两个部分的共同定位是一种原始现象。尽管这个原始特征似乎无法进行任何进一步的分析，但我仍在努力澄清足以实现共定位的接近程度。与Pietarinen（2014）在一起的Side认为，整个问题不应该用公制来解释，