Lee and Schwarz interpret meta-analytic research and replication studies as providing evidence for the robustness of cleansing effects. We argue that the currently available evidence is unconvincing because (a) publication bias and the opportunistic use of researcher degrees of freedom appear to have inflated meta-analytic effect size estimates, and (b) preregistered replications failed to find any evidence of cleansing effects.

中文翻译：

---

荟萃分析和预注册在评估清洁效果证据中的作用

Lee 和 Schwarz 将荟萃分析研究和复制研究解释为为清洁效果的稳健性提供了证据。我们认为，目前可用的证据无法令人信服，因为 (a) 发表偏倚和研究人员自由度的机会主义使用似乎夸大了元分析效应大小估计，以及 (b) 预先注册的复制未能找到任何清洁效应的证据。