The purpose of this study was to determine how inter-rater reliability scores for iPad improvisations and clarinet improvisations would compare between two different creativity assessment measures—the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) and the Test of Ability to Improvise (TAI). In addition, we examined how the overall and subscore ratings for each measure related to each other. Improvisation files were collected from 43 students who had 2 to 3 years’ experience on the clarinet. Two independent panels of judges rated the improvisations using either the CAT or the TAI. Results showed no relationships between the composite or subscores of the two measures. Inter-rater reliability ratings were moderate, and slightly higher on the TAI than the CAT except for the subscore of creativity, where the CAT reliability scores were higher. Further research is needed to understand the more nuanced differences between these two measures, as well as to find a valid a reliable tool for the measurement of creativity and improvisation for school-aged children.

这项研究的目的是确定iPad即兴演奏和单簧管即兴演奏者之间的信度之间的可靠性评分如何在两种不同的创造力评估方法（共识评估技术（CAT）和即兴能力测试（TAI））之间进行比较。此外，我们研究了每种指标的总体评分和子评分如何相互关联。从43位在单簧管上有2至3年经验的学生那里收集了即兴文件。两个独立的法官小组使用CAT或TAI对即兴创作进行评分。结果表明两种方法的组合或子分数之间没有关系。评分者之间的信度等级中等，在TAI上比CAT略高，除了创造力的子评分（CAT信度得分较高）。