ABSTRACT

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine individual differences in the day-by-day relationship between negative affect (NA) and rumination in terms of their inertia, innovation, and cross-lagged effects among people living with HIV (PLWH).

Methods

The participants were 217 PLWH with confirmed diagnoses of HIV and undergoing antiretroviral treatment. They assessed their NA and rumination for five consecutive days each evening via an online survey.

Results

Results showed that inertia in NA is negatively related to inertia in rumination. Both innovations were unrelated. However, the individuals with relatively higher overall NA were also more reactive to external factors and/or had more variability in their daily lives, to which they respond with NA. Finally, the autoregressive effects were revealed to be important for spillover effects in a direction that is coherent with a given inertia. Thus, the direction of the cascade between daily NA and rumination depends on the area of major regulatory weakness.

Conclusion

The results support the view that intensity, inertia, and innovation are distinct dimensions in spite of the common assumption that higher overall intensity of emotions and coping should be strongly related or even synonymous to their perseveration.

中文翻译：

---

消极情绪和反刍的惯性、创新和交叉滞后效应：艾滋病毒感染者的日常日记研究

摘要

客观的

本研究的目的是在 HIV 感染者 (PLWH) 的惯性、创新和交叉滞后效应方面，检查负面影响 (NA) 和沉思之间日常关系的个体差异。

方法

参与者是 217 名确诊感染 HIV 并正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的 PLWH。他们每天晚上通过在线调查连续五天评估他们的 NA 和反刍。

结果

结果表明，NA惯性与反刍惯性呈负相关。这两项创新都无关紧要。然而，具有相对较高整体 NA 的个体对外部因素的反应也更强烈和/或在日常生活中具有更多的可变性，他们会用 NA 对此做出反应。最后，发现自回归效应对于与给定惯性一致的方向上的溢出效应很重要。因此，每日 NA 和反刍之间的级联方向取决于主要监管薄弱环节。

结论

结果支持这样一种观点，即强度、惯性和创新是不同的维度，尽管普遍假设情绪和应对的整体强度较高应该与其坚持密切相关，甚至是同义词。