ABSTRACT

This article extends current debates about the worth of resilience-focused interventions in conflict-affected settings and highlights two gaps in the literature: inattention to the role of positionality, and a lack of critical reflection on the binaries drawn between individual needs and structural change. We discuss the complexities of geopolitical conflict, identify the political resistance embedded within resilience, prioritise local voices and needs, problematise Eurocentric knowledge production, and dissolve false dichotomies by honouring the distinctive purposes of different disciplines. We call for new forms of contextualised, epistemic and cognitive global justice that capture the multifaceted, dynamic nature of adversity, resilience, and transformational change.

摘要

本文扩展了当前关于在受冲突影响的环境中以复原力为重点的干预措施的价值的辩论，并强调了文献中的两个空白：对定位的作用的忽视，以及对个人需求和结构变化之间的二元关系缺乏批判性反思。我们讨论了地缘政治冲突的复杂性，确定了韧性中嵌入的政治阻力，优先考虑当地的声音和需求，解决以欧洲为中心的知识生产问题，并通过尊重不同学科的独特目的来消除错误的二分法。我们呼吁建立新形式的情境化、认知和认知全球正义，以捕捉逆境、复原力和转型变革的多方面、动态性质。