The author analyzes the final judgment of the UN tribunal convened to inquire into the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. Only one of the four men originally charged was found guilty, wholly on the basis of alleged cell‐phone communications. Although Israel was known to have comprehensively penetrated the Lebanese telecommunications sector, the tribunal made no attempt to prove conclusively that the cell‐phone calls allegedly made by the accused were actually made by them and not fabricated by a third party. This significant omission undermines the authenticity of the evidence. The tribunal also failed to consider the possible involvement of two governments that have a long history of subversion and violence in Lebanon, the United States and Israel, both totally hostile to Hezbollah and the Syrian government. All of these elements combined raise serious questions about the course of the tribunal's findings from the beginning.

中文翻译：

---

哈里里法庭的调查结果

作者分析了为调查黎巴嫩前总理拉菲克·哈里里（Rafiq Hariri）被暗杀而召集的联合国法庭的最终判决。最初，被指控的四名男子中只有一名被判有罪，完全是基于所谓的手机通讯。尽管众所周知，以色列已经全面渗透了黎巴嫩的电信部门，但仲裁庭没有试图作出结论性地证明，据称被告打来的手机实际上是由他们打来的，而不是由第三方捏造的。这种重大遗漏破坏了证据的真实性。法庭也没有考虑到两个长期以来对黎巴嫩真主党和叙利亚政府怀有敌意的，可能在黎巴嫩，美国和以色列发生颠覆和暴力事件的政府的介入。