In a feminist judgments project, feminist scholars rewrite selected legal judgments, adapting established legal forms and demonstrating that important cases could have been decided otherwise. They show that there is always ‘room to maneuver’, even within the limitations of judicial practice (Hunter, 2019). In the process, they expose both the gendered underpinnings of liberal legal reasoning, and the coherence and radical potential of feminist alternatives. The ingenuity and creativity with which judgment authors rewrite past judgments means that the edited collections produced by past projects have attracted wide readerships.

中文翻译：

---

书评：苏格兰女权主义者的判断：（重新）从外而内建立法律。

在一个女权主义判决项目中，女权主义学者重写了选定的法律判决，改编了既定的法律形式，并证明重要案件本来可以另作决定。他们表明，即使在司法实践的限制内，总会有``回旋余地''（Hunter，2019）。在此过程中，他们既揭示了自由法律推理的性别基础，又揭示了女权主义选择的连贯性和巨大潜力。判断作者重写过去的判断的独创性和创造力意味着过去的项目所产生的编辑集已经吸引了广泛的读者。