Some have claimed that the integration project has adopted a lower view of Biblical inspiration. Yet, both Biblical counselors and evangelical integrationists typically hold to a high view of the authority of Scripture and may share the same adherence to Biblical inerrancy. This article argues that difference between how Biblical counseling and integration tends to engage Scripture in their counseling approaches is due less to their doctrines of Biblical authority than to their secondary hermeneutical and related theological views. A review of the author’s model of integration as a form of interpretative activity is provided. Implications for the sufficiency of Scripture doctrine, theological interpretation of Scripture, and integrative interpretative competency in reading Scripture are considered. The evangelical integration movement is fully compatible with a robust embrace of the historic sola scriptura view of Biblical authority but not the innovation represented by a solo scriptura view.

一些人声称整合项目采用了较低的圣经灵感观。然而，圣经的辅导员和福音派的整合主义者通常对圣经的权威持很高的看法，并且可能对圣经的无误有同样的坚持。本文认为，圣经的辅导和整合如何使圣经参与他们的辅导方法之间的差异，其原因不在于他们的圣经权威学说，而在于其次要的解释学和相关的神学观点。提供了作者的整合模式作为一种解释性活动的形式的评论。考虑对圣经教义的充分性，圣经的神学解释以及阅读圣经的综合解释能力的暗示。惟独圣经权威的圣经观点，但不是由所代表的创新独奏圣经观点。