This paper aims to provide a perspective on the office productivity debate, with a particular focus on providing a framework for examining those factors relating to the design and management of the office environment.,The approach taken has been to examine the plethora of factors that might be involved, principally through a literature review, and then to group these into four generic areas of enquiry. Within each of these, potential measures of productivity are described, and these are connected to building lifecycle decisions.,Combined, the findings produce a practical framework within which various actors in the design, delivery and management offices can understand and influence the productivity question. In this way, the findings have practical implications rather than simply describing the factors that influence productivity.,The paper develops a report produced in 2017 for the British Council for Offices. Building on the main findings of the original work, this paper expands the literature review, provides more context regarding the significance of office productivity and expands upon the conclusions. The author fully acknowledges the contributions of the whole research team behind the original paper. The originality of the work lies in its development of a framework that can be applied by practitioners in the built environment.

中文翻译：

---

定义和衡量生产性办公室

本文旨在提供有关办公效率辩论的观点，特别着重于提供一个框架来研究与办公环境的设计和管理有关的因素。所采取的方法是研究可能影响办公环境的众多因素。参与，主要是通过文献综述，然后将其分为四个通用的研究领域。在每种方法中，都描述了生产力的潜在度量，并将这些度量与构建生命周期决策联系在一起。这些发现共同形成了一个实用的框架，在该框架中，设计，交付和管理办公室的各个参与者都可以理解和影响生产力问题。这样一来，调查结果就具有实际意义，而不是简单地描述影响生产率的因素。该文件制定了2017年为英国办公室理事会编写的报告。在原始工作的主要发现的基础上，本文扩展了文献综述，提供了有关办公效率重要性的更多背景信息，并扩展了结论。作者完全感谢原始论文背后的整个研究团队的贡献。这项工作的独创性在于它开发了一个框架，该框架可以由从业人员在建筑环境中应用。作者完全感谢原始论文背后的整个研究团队的贡献。这项工作的独创性在于它开发了一个框架，该框架可以由从业人员在建筑环境中应用。作者完全感谢原始论文背后的整个研究团队的贡献。这项工作的独创性在于它开发了一个框架，该框架可以由从业人员在建筑环境中应用。