This article considers the history-based research networks funded by the Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development (FPs). It sheds light on the interactions between the European Commission and scholars – Commission-appointed experts, funded researchers, but also scholars who disagree with the EU memory policy. Even if the scholars’ influence is significant, the FPs remain an instrument in the hands of the European Commission. The visions of the history of Europe brought forward are in conformance with official narratives highlighted by works on other EU memory policy instruments. This leads to a confrontation between ‘authorised’ and alternative narratives at European level. While the institutionalisation of European research networks as a form of knowledge production which is intended to be specifically European contributes to shaping ‘Europe’, the idea of the emergence of an autonomous ‘European memory space’ nevertheless deserves nuancing because of the FPs’ fragmented nature and of the role that national academic levels continue to play.

本文考虑了由研究和技术开发框架计划（FPs）资助的基于历史的研究网络。它阐明了欧盟委员会与学者之间的互动关系，这些学者是委员会任命的专家，受资助的研究人员，也包括不同意欧盟记忆政策的学者。即使学者的影响力很大，FP仍然是欧盟委员会的工具。提出的欧洲历史远景与其他欧盟记忆政策工具著作所强调的官方叙述相符。这导致了欧洲一级“授权”叙事与替代叙事之间的对抗。