This article explores the twofold key claim often made within the Biblical Counseling Movement: (1) that doctrine of the sufficiency of Scripture necessitates a Biblical counseling approach that is predominantly or exclusively derived from Scripture and (2) that the counseling approaches derived from the secular mental health professions are either unnecessary or so inherently defective as to be improper resources for counseling by Christians. Particular focus is given to two key passages used to support this perspective: 2 Peter 1:1–11 and 2 Timothy 3:1–17. It is argued that neither of these passages provide Biblical warrant for the sufficiency of Scripture doctrine as sometimes advanced by the Biblical counseling movement.

本文探讨了在圣经咨询运动中经常提出的双重主要主张：（1）经文自给自足的学说必须采用主要或完全源于圣经的圣经辅导方法；（2）世俗的辅导方法精神卫生专业不是必需的，就是天生就有缺陷，以致于基督徒的咨询资源不足。我们特别关注用于支持该观点的两个关键段落：彼得前书2：1：1-11和提摩太前书2：3：1-17。有人争辩说，这些经文都没有为圣经辅导运动有时提出的充足的圣经学说提供圣经依据。