https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12735

Article first published online: 25 January 2017

Correction to Start and Gilbert (2017) Predator personality structures prey communities and trophic cascades. Ecology Letters, 20: 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12735

1. In the original paper, the methods incorrectly stated that individual dragonfly larvae were randomly assigned to treatments in the mesocosm experiment. The description should have read, ‘Larvae were assigned systematically to capture the full range of activity variation in the one‐predator treatment. In the two‐predator treatment, low activity individuals were primarily paired with low activity individuals, and high activity individuals with high activity individuals, in order to maximise variation in average activity level among replicates’.
2. In the original paper, it was stated that Figures 2b and 4b showed best‐fit lines from a generalised linear model, but the lines plotted were from a linear regression. The appropriate statistics were reported in the text, so the results do not change. We provide an updated version of these two figures in Figure 1.
3. Data from supplementary assays were not posted on Dryad and were subsequently lost when a computer and hard drive were stolen in 2019. The majority of the raw assay data we analysed throughout the paper are shown in scatterplots (Fig. 1a, and Figs. S1 and S3 of paper). The exception is zooplankton feeding rate data that are presented as summary data (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1. Replotting Figures 2b (top) and 4b (bottom) from Start and Gilbert (2017). The solid lines are predictions from the GLM reported in the text of the original paper, and the dashed lines are those from the original figures. Lines are coloured as in the original figures, with 1 predator (light grey), 2 predators (dark grey) and 2 predators with replicates where cannibalism occurred removed (red).

中文翻译：

---

更正

https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12735

文章首次在线发表：2017年1月25日

Correction to Start and Gilbert（2017）捕食者的人格构造了猎物群落和营养级联。生态快报，20：366–374。https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12735

1. 在原始论文中，这些方法错误地指出，将个体蜻蜓幼虫随机分配到中观实验中进行处理。描述应读为：“系统地分配了小生菜，以捕获单一捕食者治疗中所有活动范围的变化。在两种捕食者的治疗中，低活性个体主要与低活性个体配对，高活性个体与高活性个体配对，以最大程度地提高复制品之间平均活性水平的差异。
2. 在原始论文中，有人说图2b和4b显示了来自广义线性模型的最佳拟合线，但是绘制的线来自线性回归。文本中报告了适当的统计信息，因此结果不会发生变化。我们在图1中提供了这两个图的更新版本。
3. 补充测定的数据未发布在Dryad上，随后在2019年计算机和硬盘被盗时丢失。我们在整篇论文中分析的大部分原始测定数据都显示在散点图中（图1a，图S1和图1和图2）。 S3纸）。浮游动物的摄食率数据除外，它们以摘要数据的形式呈现（图1b）。

图1。重新绘制Start和Gilbert（2017）的图2b（上）和4b（下）。实线是原始文件中报告的GLM的预测，虚线是原始图的预测。线条的颜色与原始图中的一样，带有1个捕食者（浅灰色），2个捕食者（深灰色）和2个捕食者，其中重复出现食人症（红色）。