当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The unburied. On archaeological objects and objectives
Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2018-05-11 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203818000053
Gavin Lucas

Assaf Nativ has written a bold and challenging paper and one which prompts a great deal of reflection. Although highly theoretical, it is also a paper that engages quite directly with the concerns of our discipline and is a good example of what one might dub philosophical (or meta-)archaeology rather than philosophy applied to archaeology. Moreover, Nativ has a very clear style of exposition that gives the reader a great deal to sink his or her teeth into. Which is precisely what I want to do now. And if what follows seems excessively critical or negative, I hope it will also be taken as a sign of my respect for his taking on a topic fraught with difficulties and a conviction that my commentary should try and match up to his own carefully argued text.

中文翻译:

未埋者。关于考古对象和目标

Assaf Nativ 写了一篇大胆而富有挑战性的论文,并且引发了很多反思。尽管它具有高度的理论性,但它也是一篇与我们学科的关注点直接相关的论文,并且是一个很好的例子,说明了人们可能称之为哲学(或元)考古学而不是哲学应用于考古学。此外,Nativ 有一种非常清晰的阐述风格,让读者可以深入了解。这正是我现在想要做的。如果接下来的内容看起来过于批评或消极,我希望这也将被视为我对他处理一个充满困难的话题的尊重,并相信我的评论应该尝试与他自己经过仔细论证的文本相匹配。
更新日期:2018-05-11
down
wechat
bug