当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Applying an anarchist lens to the archaeological record. On Borake’s ‘anarchistic actions’ in Scandinavian culture history
Archaeological Dialogues ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-01 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203819000187
Bill Angelbeck

1 The title of this piece is a Jamaican proverb. 2 Clastres did not resolve how authoritarian rule in neighbouring communities could have originated beyond invoking influence from a further external group, and so on, leaving a ‘chicken-and-egg’-style ‘mystery’ of the origin of political authority for future researchers to grapple with (Clastres 1989, 205). Barclay (1990, 136) identified the ‘big-man’ style of leadership as being most vulnerable to internal authoritarian takeover. 3 There is serious doubt whether there ever was a historical Robin Hood, and even if we were to accept that the medieval stories did derive from an actual person, their actions and motivations are entirely obscured by time (Knight 2006; Baldwin 2010).

中文翻译:

在考古记录中应用无政府主义者的镜头。博雷克在斯堪的纳维亚文化史上的“无政府行为”

1这首歌的标题是牙买加谚语。2 Clastres并没有解决邻居社区的威权统治是如何产生的,而不仅仅是受到其他外部群体的影响,依此类推,从而给未来研究者留下了政治权威起源的“鸡与蛋”式的“谜”。 (Clastres 1989,205)。巴克莱(Barclay,1990:136)认为“大人物”领导风格最容易受到内部威权主义接管。3是否存在过历史性的罗宾汉(Robin Hood)是一个严重的疑问,即使我们接受中世纪的故事确实来自一个真实的人,他们的行动和动机也完全被时间所掩盖(Knight 2006; Baldwin 2010)。
更新日期:2019-12-01
down
wechat
bug