当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The asymmetries of disentanglement
Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2017-12-08 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203817000186
Konrad A. Antczak

In this dialogue, Hodder and Lucas skilfully manoeuvre the winding trails of archaeological theory during the last decades and critically juxtapose the discussion of symmetry and asymmetry of relations between entities with that of entanglement. Their provocative dialogue compellingly leads to the conclusion that most entanglements are in fact asymmetrical. Whereas I mostly concur with the conclusions of the dialogue, addressing the authors’ closing statements I would like to highlight the need to equally (in some ways, symmetrically) consider disentanglement as the process opposite to entanglement, along with the consequences of such disentanglement. If we are to understand better the contexts and politics of entanglements – concerns that this dialogue brings to the fore – I furthermore suggest that we more closely scrutinize the density (quantity) and joining (quality) of entanglements, as well as pay closer attention to memory, emotion and affect in entanglements.

中文翻译:

分离的不对称性

在这次对话中,霍德和卢卡斯巧妙地驾驭了过去几十年考古学理论的曲折轨迹,并将实体之间关系的对称性和不对称性的讨论与纠缠的讨论并列。他们挑衅的对话令人信服地得出结论,大多数纠缠实际上是不对称的。虽然我大多同意对话的结论,但在谈到作者的结束语时,我想强调需要平等地(在某些方面,对称地)考虑解开作为与纠缠相反的过程,以及这种解开的后果。如果我们要更好地理解纠缠的背景和政治——这种对话带来的担忧——我进一步建议我们更仔细地审查密度(数量)和加入(质量)纠缠,以及更加关注纠缠中的记忆、情感和情感。
更新日期:2017-12-08
down
wechat
bug