当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Framing matters
Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2017-05-04 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203817000083
Reinhard Bernbeck

Kerstin Hofmann and Philipp Stockhammer's essay on theory in ‘Beyond antiquarianism’ displays a mood that lacks self-confidence, despite a more optimistic outlook on theoretical reflections in their field than an earlier paper by Ulrike Sommer (2000b). The citations, amounting to 60 per cent of the text, are just an outward sign of that mood. A more revealing element is the essay's framing. Hofmann and Stockhammer do not discuss theory in German-speaking archaeology, as their abbreviation ‘GSA’ seems to imply, but rather restrict themselves to its prehistoric subdivision: the essay is actually only about ‘GSPA’. What are the preconditions for and the consequences of this self-imposed disciplinary (and disciplining) restriction?

中文翻译:

构图很重要

Kerstin Hofmann 和 Philipp Stockhammer 在“超越古物主义”中关于理论的论文表现出一种缺乏自信的情绪,尽管他们对该领域的理论反思比 Ulrike Sommer (2000b) 的早期论文更为乐观。占正文 60% 的引用只是这种情绪的外在表现。一个更具启发性的元素是文章的框架。Hofmann 和 Stockhammer 没有讨论德语考古学中的理论,正如他们的缩写“GSA”似乎暗示的那样,而是将自己限制在史前细分:这篇文章实际上只是关于“GSPA”。这种自我施加的纪律(和纪律)限制的先决条件和后果是什么?
更新日期:2017-05-04
down
wechat
bug