A comparative assessment of Ana Castillo’s The Guardians and Louise Erdrich’s The Round House reveals that a combination of legal restrictions and ambiguities in U.S. borderlands contributes to human rights violations, while also making clear that there cannot be a singular strategy for advancing indigenous human rights in these borderlands. By identifying specific policies and attitudes that need reform, the novels empower readers to take action and suggest that literature has a larger role in human rights activism than just spurring empathy.

中文翻译：

---

美国边疆地区的文学说教与集体人权：安娜·卡斯蒂略的《守护者》和路易丝·厄德里奇的《圆屋》

对 Ana Castillo 的 The Guardians 和 Louise Erdrich 的 The Round House 的比较评估表明，美国边境地区的法律限制和含糊不清的结合导致了侵犯人权，同时也明确指出，在这些地区不可能有单一的促进土著人权的战略。边疆。通过确定需要改革的具体政策和态度，小说赋予读者采取行动的能力，并表明文学在人权活动中的作用不仅仅是激发同情心。