This article investigates how Hanafi jurists responded to armed rebellion against local authorities in Mecca. I examine two understudied legal treatises that have been written about the sack of Mecca by armed rebel groups in 1632. These treatises provide important insights for studying how premodern Islamic legal discourses dealt with the issue of rebellion under Ottoman rule and sovereignty. I contend that it is in this context of rebellion and violence that we can test the contours of Ottoman imperial power and authority. I argue that recurrent defiance to the Ottoman political order compelled Hanafi jurists to revisit the earlier commitments of the school with regard to dissent and political change. In these two treatises, Hanafis insisted that armed rebellion in the Sacred Mosque in Mecca went beyond any valid political grievances – which would have been admitted as a plausible cause for dissent – and justified a swift military intervention.

中文翻译：

---

阿拉伯半岛的奥斯曼士兵：17世纪麦加圣寺内的武装叛乱

本文调查了哈纳菲法学家如何应对针对麦加地方当局的武装叛乱。我研究了两篇关于 1632 年武装叛乱团体洗劫麦加的未经研究的法律论文。这些论文为研究前现代伊斯兰法律话语如何处理奥斯曼统治和主权下的叛乱问题提供了重要的见解。我认为，正是在这种叛乱和暴力的背景下，我们可以检验奥斯曼帝国权力和权威的轮廓。我认为，对奥斯曼政治秩序的反复蔑视迫使哈纳菲法学家重新审视学校在异议和政治变革方面的早期承诺。在这两篇论文中，