The politics of shame makes part of the politics of affects. It is becoming a prominent form of politics in the age of social media. Social media, insofar as it presents a plurality of perspectives, can be a milieu for public deliberation. Acknowledging that politics of shame can be of different types, this essay considers two different experiences of politics of shame in social media. It compares public shaming as an activist strategy of moral reform in contemporary feminist politics with politics of shame under authoritarianism by concentrating on two cases from Turkey. At first the structure of shame will be articulated by recourse to the phenomenological and psychological theories of shame. In public shaming for feminist moral reform, the publically shamed agent, who is a feminist, is accused by a group for performing an injurious speech act or a deed with mediate pernicious, harmful consequences. It is my contention that a theory of gender or sexual difference can be false, but is not morally equivalent to an attack on somebody’s existence, racism, and acts of genocide denial. Practices of public shaming in feminism are not self-defense; they are repressive and unfair attacks that destroy public deliberation. It is also problematic to attack feminists, on the grounds of arguments that are based on analogies, which do not apply to non-Western geo-political contexts. All politics of shame is not wrong. For example, the practices of politics of shame that concern non-elaborate mourning have moral and political value insofar as they can play a role in challenging an authoritarian political rule. In this case, the public shame results from attesting to injustice done to the other(s) in the public sphere, a public sphere, which is already closed, and highly manipulated by the authoritarian state.

中文翻译：

---

土耳其的耻辱政治：公开羞辱和哀悼

羞耻政治成为影响政治的一部分。在社交媒体时代，它正在成为一种重要的政治形式。社交媒体，就其呈现的多种观点而言，可以成为公众审议的环境。承认羞耻政治可以有不同的类型，本文考虑了社交媒体中羞耻政治的两种不同体验。通过关注土耳其的两个案例，将公开羞辱作为当代女权主义政治中道德改革的激进策略与威权主义下的羞耻政治进行了比较。首先，羞耻的结构将通过求助于羞耻的现象学和心理学理论来阐明。在公开羞辱女权主义道德改革中，公开羞辱的女权主义者代理人，被团体指控进行有害的言论行为或调解有害、有害后果的行为。我的观点是，性别或性别差异的理论可能是错误的，但在道德上并不等同于对某人的存在、种族主义和种族灭绝否认行为的攻击。女权主义中公开羞辱的做法不是自卫；它们是破坏公众审议的压制性和不公平的攻击。基于类比​​的论点攻击女权主义者也是有问题的，这些论点不适用于非西方地缘政治背景。所有的耻辱政治都没有错。例如，涉及非精心设计的哀悼的羞耻政治实践具有道德和政治价值，因为它们可以在挑战专制政治规则方面发挥作用。在这种情况下，