It has been commonplace for over a century to argue that the distinctively Lutheran form of the communicatio idiomatum leads naturally to kenotic christology, divine passibility, or both. Although this argument has been generally accepted as a historical claim, has also been advanced repeatedly as a criticism of ‘classical theism’ and has featured significantly in almost all recent defences of divine passibility, I argue that it does not work: the Lutheran scholastics had ample resources drawn from nothing more than ecumenical trinitarian and christological dogma to defend their denial of the genus tapeinoticum . I argue further that this defence, if right, undermines a remarkably wide series of proposals in contemporary systematic theology.

中文翻译：

---

不对称的假设：为什么路德教会的基督教不会导致犹太主义或神圣的可及性

一个多世纪以来，人们一直在争论，独特的路德教形式的交流习语自然导致了狂热的基督教，神的可及性，或两者兼而有之。尽管该论点已被普遍接受为历史主张，也作为对“古典有神论”的批评而反复提出，并且在几乎所有关于神的可及性的最新辩护中都具有重要意义，但我认为这是行不通的：路德教派丰富的资源来自普世三位一体和基督教教条，来捍卫他们否定Tapeinoticum属。我进一步指出，这种辩护（如果正确的话）会破坏当代系统神学中一系列广泛的提议。