What does it mean to say “Yes” to life? What does it mean to affirm life? What does it mean to not be nihilistic? One possible answer is the appropriation of finitude. But Klossowski argues that this amounts to a “voluntarist” fatalism. Though Klossowski draws attention to the temptation of “voluntarist” fatalism on the part of Nietzsche and readers of Nietzsche, he himself is tempted by redemption, i.e., by being redeemed from the weight of responsibility. Using the very “logic” of Klossowski’s own reading of the eternal return, Blanchot will call this possibility of redemption (on the part of Klossowski) into question. Blanchot’s reading of Nietzsche’s eternal return draws attention to that moment (within the work of Nietzsche) when death as possibility turns into death as impossibility. This weakening of the negative brings, according to Blanchot, not redemption from the burden of responsibility, but infinite responsibility.

中文翻译：

---

布朗肖和克洛索夫斯基谈尼采的永恒回归

对生活说“是”是什么意思？肯定生命是什么意思？不虚无主义是什么意思？一种可能的答案是对有限性的挪用。但 Klossowski 认为，这相当于一种“自愿主义”宿命论。尽管克洛索夫斯基提请注意尼采和尼采读者“自愿主义”宿命论的诱惑，但他本人却受到救赎的诱惑，即从责任的重压中被救赎。使用 Klossowski 自己对永恒回归的解读的“逻辑”，Blancho 将对这种救赎的可能性（对 Klossowski 而言）提出质疑。布朗肖对尼采永恒回归的解读将注意力引向了那一刻（在尼采的作品中），当作为可能的死亡变成作为不可能的死亡时。这种负面的削弱带来了，