The paper tackles Patocka’s ideas on the world crisis and on the possibility that it may be overcome. The key flaw in Patocka’s approach, one which also underpins his Eurocentrism, is identified as his drawing a firm line between a free, truly historical way of life, and unfree, earthbound living. In order to sketch a usable conception, the paper reinterprets Patocka’s notion of the three movements of existence, thereby connecting his historical and political reflections with his ontological thought and also with Arendt’s concept of action. The dichotomy between earthiness and freedom, corresponding to the contrast between the first two movements and the third, is refuted by emphasizing not only the inseparability of all the movements of existence but also the historicity of each of them. On the basis of such a reinterpretation, Patocka’s concept can provide a phenomenological framework not only for a non-Eurocentric analysis of human being in the world but also of the world crisis.

中文翻译：

---

走向世界危机的非欧洲中心分析：重新考虑帕托奇卡的方法

这篇论文探讨了帕托卡关于世界危机以及它可能被克服的可能性的想法。帕托卡方法的关键缺陷，也是他的欧洲中心主义的基础，被认为是他在自由、真正具有历史意义的生活方式和不自由、世俗的生活方式之间划出了一条明确的界线。为了勾勒出一个可用的概念，本文重新诠释了帕托卡关于存在的三种运动的概念，从而将他的历史和政治反思与他的本体论思想以及阿伦特的行动概念联系起来。与前两个运动和第三个运动之间的对比相对应的朴实与自由之间的二分法被驳斥，不仅强调所有存在运动的不可分割性，而且强调它们中的每一个运动的历史性。在这样的重新解读的基础上，