当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ratio › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The persuasiveness puzzle about bootstrapping
Ratio ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-06 , DOI: 10.1111/rati.12253
Guido Melchior 1, 2
Affiliation  

Abstract This paper aims at resolving a puzzle about the persuasiveness of bootstrapping. On the one hand, bootstrapping is not a persuasive method of settling questions about the reliability of a source. On the other hand, our beliefs that our sense apparatus is reliable is based on other empirically formed beliefs, that is, they are acquired via a presumably complex bootstrapping process. I will argue that when we doubt the reliability of a source, bootstrapping is not a persuasive method for coming to believe that the source is reliable. However, when being initially unaware of a source and its reliability, as in the case of forming beliefs about our sense apparatus, bootstrapping can be eventually persuasive.

中文翻译:

关于自举的说服力之谜

摘要 本文旨在解决一个关于引导程序说服力的难题。一方面,自助法不是解决有关来源可靠性问题的有说服力的方法。另一方面,我们认为我们的感官是可靠的信念是基于其他经验形成的信念,也就是说,它们是通过一个可能复杂的引导过程获得的。我会争辩说,当我们怀疑来源的可靠性时,自举法并不是让人们相信来源可靠的一种有说服力的方法。然而,当最初不知道来源及其可靠性时,例如在对我们的感觉器官形成信念的情况下,自举最终可能具有说服力。
更新日期:2020-01-06
down
wechat
bug