ABSTRACT Discursive factors have not figured prominently in implementation research. This article fills this gap by addressing the material and discursive conflicts articulated around equality at workplace between women and men in multilevel judicial contexts. It studies obstacles to and opportunities for the judicial implementation of EU equal employment policies in Spain by analyzing two cases of parental rights to childcare litigated before Spanish and supranational courts, namely the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The claimants are working parents who litigate for the recognition of their right to provide childcare. In judicial implementation multiple meanings about women, gender and intersectionality can be articulated and counteracted at different levels. Frame analysis of selected judicial documents and content analysis of legal proceedings and interviews show that simultaneous favorable institutions, framing, and actors are needed for implementing EU equal employment policies in a way that allows overcoming the gendered division of care and paid work. Distinguishing among ‘women’, ‘gender’ and ‘intersectionality’ approaches, we assess the extent to which the result of judicial implementation is the transformation of gender roles towards equal sharing of care.

中文翻译：

---

争取平等分享护理？在西班牙司法执行欧盟平等就业和工作与生活平衡政策

摘要话语因素在实施研究中并未占据重要地位。本文通过解决围绕多级司法环境中男女之间工作场所平等所阐明的实质性和话语冲突，填补了这一空白。它通过分析在西班牙和超国家法院（欧洲联盟法院和欧洲人权法院）提起的两个育儿权父母权利案件，研究了欧盟在西班牙司法执行司法歧视政策的障碍和机遇。索赔人是在职父母，他们为承认其提供托儿服务的权利而提起诉讼。在司法实施中，可以在不同层次上阐明和消除关于妇女，性别和交往的多重含义。对选定司法文件的框架分析以及对法律程序和访谈的内容分析表明，同时实施有利的机构，框架和参与者对于实施欧盟的平等就业政策是必要的，从而可以克服按性别划分的照料和有偿工作。在区分“妇女”，“性别”和“交叉性”方法时，我们评估了司法实施的结果是将性别角色转变为平等分享护理的程度。