This article has two objectives. In the first part, I present a critical overview of the extensive anthropological literature that may be deemed “phenomenological.” Following this critique, which is built up around a classification into four different varieties of phenomenological anthropology, I discuss the relationship between phenomenological anthropology and the ontological turn (OT). Contrary to received wisdom within the anthropological discipline, I suggest that OT has several things in common with the phenomenological project. For the same reason, I argue, it is not accurate to posit OT and phenomenology as opposing or antagonistic projects, as they are often depicted among critics and advocates of OT alike. On the contrary, I go as far as suggesting, OT may be understood as one of the most concerted attempts anthropology has produced to realize a distinctly anthropological version of Husserl’s method of phenomenological bracketing, namely what could be called the ontological epoché.

中文翻译：

---

人类学时代：现象学与本体论转向

本文有两个目标。在第一部分中，我对可能被视为“现象学”的大量人类学文献进行了批判性概述。在围绕着现象人类学的四个不同变体进行分类的基础上进行的这种批评之后，我将讨论现象人类学与本体论转向（OT）之间的关系。与人类学领域内的公认智慧相反，我认为旧约理论与现象学项目具有几项共同点。我认为，出于同样的原因，将旧约和现象学视为对立或对立的项目并不准确，因为它们经常被旧约的批评家和拥护者所描绘。相反，我尽可能地暗示，