当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophy of the Social Sciences › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Problem of Analytic Philosophy
Philosophy of the Social Sciences ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-11 , DOI: 10.1177/0048393119853246
Joseph Agassi 1 , Ian C. Jarvie 2
Affiliation  

Dainton and Robinson’s Companion traces lines of descent of analytic philosophy from ancestors. They characterize analytic philosophy as a movement, a tradition, a style, and a commitment to the values of clarity and rigor. Critics of the ancestral movements and of analytic philosophy as such are conspicuous by their absence. The sociology of the spread of analytic philosophy is ventured, updating the original effort by Gellner.

中文翻译:

分析哲学问题

丹顿和罗宾逊的《同伴》追溯了祖先分析哲学的血统。他们将分析哲学的特征描述为一种运动,一种传统,一种风格以及对清晰和严谨价值观的承诺。对祖先运动和分析哲学的批评者因其缺席而引人注目。对分析哲学传播的社会学进行了探索,从而更新了盖尔纳(Gellner)最初的努力。
更新日期:2019-06-11
down
wechat
bug