当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophy of the Social Sciences › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Ubiquity of Understanding: Dimensions of Understanding in the Social and Natural Sciences
Philosophy of the Social Sciences ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-18 , DOI: 10.1177/0048393119847103
Karsten R. Stueber 1
Affiliation  

Taking my departure from the discussion of the concept of understanding in contemporary epistemology, I will suggest that we need to fine-tune the concept of explanatory understanding in order to comprehensively describe the epistemic endeavors of the natural and social sciences. I will distinguish among the theoretical, narrative, and empathic modes of understanding. None of the sciences are exclusively characterized by one of these modes of understanding. Nevertheless, I will suggest that only the human sciences are characterized by a complex interplay of all three modes. Finally, I will argue that we can account for the explanatory autonomy of rational action explanations in light of this complex interplay.

中文翻译:

理解的普遍性:社会科学和自然科学中的理解维度

脱离对当代认识论中理解概念的讨论,我建议我们需要微调解释性理解的概念,以便全面描述自然科学和社会科学的认识论努力。我将在理论,叙述和共情的理解方式之间进行区分。没有一种科学具有这些理解方式之一的独有特征。不过,我将建议,只有人类科学具有这三种模式的复杂相互作用。最后,我将指出,鉴于这种复杂的相互作用,我们可以解释理性行为解释的解释自主性。
更新日期:2019-05-18
down
wechat
bug