In the article, we elaborate an interdisciplinary methodological framework that enables us to study and prepare the grounds for the development of organizational practices through discourse perspectives. The framework differs from mainstream monological and complexity reducing tendencies within organizational studies in that it argues for an approach that takes in historical, broad, and situational power relations and discourses into consideration when we engage in ethical organizational development. We place the framework within organizational discourse studies (ODS) and discuss how the intersection of Bakhtinian and Foucauldian ideas and concepts, as well as their diverse analytical strategies and focuses, contributes to the field. The combination entails taking a dissensus approach to organizational discursive phenomena that we view as dynamic features that are historically and locally (re)created through battles of unifying (centripetal) and diversifying (centrifugal) force relations. Following similar ideas of Deleuze and Bakhtin, we argue that dialogue and every (organizational) situation is seen as a plurivocal, open-ended, and unique time-space in which subjects have agency to change and transform the power relations and lines of subjectification that they are embedded in. We arrive at a methodological framework that bridges the gulf that often exists between discourse perspectives that tend to either focus on situated or more abstract and historical discursive dimensions. Furthermore, the frame involves an ethics of dispositif and dialogue that insists that organizational discourse scholars engage in organizational discourse activism furthering local change processes.

中文翻译：

---

组织话语行动主义的方法论框架：处置与对话的伦理

在文章中，我们阐述了一个跨学科的方法论框架，使我们能够通过话语视角研究和准备组织实践发展的基础。该框架不同于组织研究中主流的单一性和复杂性降低趋势，因为它主张采用一种方法，在我们从事道德组织发展时，将历史、广泛和情境的权力关系和话语考虑在内。我们将框架置于组织话语研究 (ODS) 中，并讨论巴赫金和福柯的思想和概念的交叉点，以及他们不同的分析策略和重点，如何对该领域做出贡献。这种组合需要对组织话语现象采取不同意见的方法，我们将其视为通过统一（向心）和多样化（离心）力量关系的战斗在历史和局部（重新）创造的动态特征。遵循德勒兹和巴赫金的类似观点，我们认为对话和每一个（组织）情境都被视为一个多元的、开放式的和独特的时空，在这个时空中，主体有能力改变和改造权力关系和主体化路线。它们被嵌入其中。我们得出了一个方法论框架，它弥合了话语观点之间经常存在的鸿沟，这些观点往往侧重于情境或更抽象和历史的话语维度。此外，