Abstract This article seeks to distill key moments in the early work of the philosopher John D. Caputo. In considering his early investigations of Martin Heidegger, it argues that an adequate account of the trajectory of his later theological project requires a refraction through a crucial double gesture in these earlier writings. To this end, the article follows Caputo’s relationship with Heidegger where the optics of ‘overcoming metaphysics’ are laid bare (the first gesture). In these deliberations, alongside Neo-Scholastic Thomism, it is clear that what constitutes (theological) metaphysics for Caputo is any thinking which fails to think that which ‘gives’ the distinction between Being and beings. The second gesture, then, reveals ‘a certain way’ (d’une certaine maniére) of reading that allows him not only the unique possibility to re-read Scholastic Thomism by way of Meister Eckhart, but also the delimitation of the mythological construal of Being in the later Heidegger himself. The article’s methodological argument is that this transgressionary impulse gleaned from Heidegger, constitutes the ‘origins’ of Caputo’s move into the ethical-religious paradigm of deconstruction and, therefore, is also axiomatic for his later radical theology of ‘religion without religion.’

中文翻译：

---

论卡普托的海德格尔：向没有宗教的宗教犯罪的罪魁祸首

摘要本文旨在提炼哲​​学家约翰·卡普托（John D. Caputo）早期工作中的关键时刻。在考虑他对马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）的早期研究时，它认为，要充分了解他后来的神学计划的轨迹，需要在这些早期著作中通过至关重要的双重姿态进行反思。为此，本文遵循卡普托与海德格尔的关系，其中“克服形而上学”的光学原理被暴露出来（第一个手势）。在这些讨论中，与新学派的托马斯主义一起，很显然，构成卡普托的（神学）形而上学的是任何未能认为“赋予”了存在与存在之间区别的思想。然后，第二个手势 揭示了一种“确定的方式”（d'une sureemaniére）阅读，这不仅使他不仅具有通过埃克哈特大人重新阅读经院托马斯主义的独特可能性，而且还使后来的海德格尔本人对神话中的存在进行了界定。这篇文章的方法论论点是，这种从海德格尔身上收集到的过犯冲动，构成了卡普托进入解构的伦理宗教范式的“起源”，因此，对于他后来的激进神学“无宗教信仰的宗教”也是不言而喻的。