当前位置: X-MOL 学术Open Theology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Problem of Arbitrary Creation for Impassibility
Open Theology ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-18 , DOI: 10.1515/opth-2020-0110
R. T. Mullins 1
Affiliation  

Abstract There is a particular question that has plagued classical Christian theism over the centuries. What reason could God have for creating a universe? In this article, I shall articulate the unique claims of classical theism that other rival models of God lack. I shall argue that classical theism’s unique commitments entail that God cannot create the universe for a reason. Thus, any nonclassical model of God can claim to have the advantage over classical theism because they can affirm that God creates the universe for a reason. In Section 1, I shall articulate classical theism. In Section 2, I shall lay the groundwork for the debate by explaining what a reason is and what a creation is. In Section 3, I shall argue that a classical theist cannot affirm that God creates the universe for a reason, thus conflicting with God’s perfect rationality.

中文翻译:

不可逾越的任意创造问题

摘要几个世纪以来,一个特殊的问题困扰着古典基督教有神论。上帝有什么理由创造宇宙?在本文中,我将阐述其他神的对立模型所缺乏的古典神论的独特主张。我将争辩说,古典有神论的独特承诺意味着上帝不能出于某种原因创造宇宙。因此,任何非经典的上帝模型都可以声称比古典有神论者具有优势,因为它们可以肯定上帝是出于某种原因创造了宇宙。在第一节中,我将阐述古典有神论。在第二部分中,我将通过解释什么是原因和什么是创造物来奠定辩论的基础。在第三节中,我将论证古典有神论者不能肯定上帝创造宇宙是有原因的,因此与上帝的完美理性相冲突。
更新日期:2020-07-18
down
wechat
bug