Abstract: This essay examines the status of the example and the exemplary in two senses: first, as the place, function, and value of the literary example in computational humanities; and, second, as the exemplary author, the author that stands in for and represents a much wider school or field. When it comes to digital humanities, Franco Moretti—rightly or wrongly (but this is part of the contested state of examples)—still is “the example.” At stake in the article is Moretti’s computational challenge to literary theory via the overdetermined example of Hegel’s reading of Antigone. Sophocles’ drama—which for Hegel provides the exemplary tragic structure of “two equally justified” powers colliding (the law of the home and the law of the state in the figures of Antigone and Creon)—becomes the proxy for Moretti’s own “equally dear” powers in conflict, close and distant reading.

中文翻译：

---

悲剧，例如：远距离阅读和典范阅读（莫雷蒂）

摘要：本文从两种意义上考察了例子和典范的地位：首先，作为计算人文文学例子的地位，作用和价值；第二，作为典范作者，代表并代表着一个广阔的学校或领域的作者。在数字人文学科方面，弗兰科·莫雷蒂（Franco Moretti）正确与错误（但这是有争议的示例状态的一部分）仍然是“示例”。这篇文章的重点是莫雷蒂通过黑格尔对《安提戈涅》的阅读中的预定例子，对文学理论的计算挑战。Sophocles的戏剧-为黑格尔提供了“两个同样正当”的权力碰撞的典型悲剧结构（安提戈涅和克里昂人物的家庭法和国家法）-成为莫雷蒂自己“同样亲爱的”的代理人冲突中的权力，