This paper examines the evolution of Edmund Husserl’s theory of perceptual occlusion. This task is accomplished in two stages. First, I elucidate Husserl’s conclusion, from his 1901 Logical Investigations , that the occluded parts of perceptual objects are intended by partial signitive acts. I focus on two doctrines of that account. I examine Husserl’s insight that signitive intentions are composed of Gehalt and I discuss his conclusion that signitive intentions sit on the continuum of fullness. Second, the paper discloses how Husserl transforms his 1901 philosophy in his 1913 revisions to the Sixth Logical Investigation, affirming that the occluded parts of perceptual objects are intended by empty contiguity acts. I demonstrate how he overturns the two core doctrines of his theory from the Investigations in these revisions, claiming that empty intentions are not composed of Gehalt and asserting that those acts break with the continuum of fullness. Husserl implements these changes to solve problems that arise from his recognition of two new kinds of intentions; darker and completely dark acts. Finally, in the conclusion, I cash out this analysis, by indicating that, in 1913, Husserl transforms his theory of fulfillment on the basis of his new insights about empty acts.

中文翻译：

---

胡塞尔 1901 年和 1913 年的知觉闭塞哲学：意义、空洞和黑暗意图

本文考察了 Edmund Husserl 的知觉遮挡理论的演变。该任务分两个阶段完成。首先，我阐明胡塞尔从他 1901 年的《逻辑研究》中得出的结论，即知觉对象的闭塞部分是由部分意指行为所意图的。我专注于该帐户的两个学说。我考察了胡塞尔关于意指由 Gehalt 组成的洞察力，并讨论了他的结论，即意指意图位于完整的连续统上。其次，这篇论文揭示了胡塞尔如何在他 1913 年对第六次逻辑研究的修订中转变他 1901 年的哲学，确认知觉对象的被遮挡部分是由空的邻接行为所意图的。我展示了他如何从这些修订版的调查中推翻他的理论的两个核心学说，声称空的意图不是由 Gehalt 组成的，并断言这些行为打破了圆满的连续统。胡塞尔实施这些变化是为了解决由于他对两种新意图的认识而产生的问题；更黑暗和完全黑暗的行为。最后，在结论中，我通过指出胡塞尔在 1913 年基于他对空洞行为的新见解改变了他的实现理论来兑现这一分析。