当前位置: X-MOL 学术Metaphilosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Hypocritical Blame, Fairness, and Standing
Metaphilosophy ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.1111/meta.12281
Cristina Roadevin 1
Affiliation  

This paper argues that hypocritical blame renders blame inappropriate. Someone should not express her blame if she is guilty of the same thing for which she is blaming others, in the absence of an admission of fault. In failing to blame herself for the same violations of norms she condemns in another, the hypocrite evinces important moral faults, which undermine her right to blame. The hypocrite refuses or culpably fails to admit her own mistakes, while at the same time demands that others admit theirs. The paper argues that this lack of reciprocity—expecting others to take morality seriously by apologizing for their faults, without one doing the same in return—is what makes hypocritical blame unfair.

中文翻译:

虚伪的责备、公平和立场

本文认为虚伪的责备使责备不恰当。在没有承认过错的情况下,如果她犯了与她责备他人相同的事情,那么某人不应该表达她的责备。伪君子没有因为她在另一个人身上谴责的同样违反规范的行为而责怪自己,这表明了重要的道德错误,这削弱了她的责备权。伪君子拒绝或有罪地不承认自己的错误,同时要求别人承认他们的错误。这篇论文认为,这种缺乏互惠——期望他人通过为自己的错误道歉来严肃对待道德,而没有人做出同样的回报——是使虚伪的指责变得不公平的原因。
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug