当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Liverpool Law Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Police Powers and Article 5 ECHR: Time for a New Approach to the Interpretation of the Right to Liberty
Liverpool Law Review ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s10991-020-09255-y Richard A. Edwards
Liverpool Law Review ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-22 , DOI: 10.1007/s10991-020-09255-y Richard A. Edwards
This paper discusses the approach of British and European Courts to the interpretation and application of the Article 5 ECHR right to liberty when faced with police powers. The paper argues that the long-standing approach of the European Court of Human Rights in Guzzardi v Italy [1980] ECHR 7367/76 is wrong and should be replaced with a new interpretation based on coercion. The paper goes on to argue that a new approach would allow the courts to effectively protect both Convention rights and the rule of law.
中文翻译:
警察权力和《欧洲人权公约》第 5 条:是时候采用新方法来解释自由权了
本文讨论了英国和欧洲法院在面临警察权力时如何解释和适用《欧洲人权公约》第 5 条的自由权。该文件认为,欧洲人权法院在 Guzzardi v Italy [1980] ECHR 7367/76 一案中的长期做法是错误的,应该被基于强制的新解释所取代。该文件继续争辩说,一种新的方法将使法院能够有效地保护公约权利和法治。
更新日期:2020-07-22
中文翻译:
警察权力和《欧洲人权公约》第 5 条:是时候采用新方法来解释自由权了
本文讨论了英国和欧洲法院在面临警察权力时如何解释和适用《欧洲人权公约》第 5 条的自由权。该文件认为,欧洲人权法院在 Guzzardi v Italy [1980] ECHR 7367/76 一案中的长期做法是错误的,应该被基于强制的新解释所取代。该文件继续争辩说,一种新的方法将使法院能够有效地保护公约权利和法治。