当前位置: X-MOL 学术Linguistics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Distributional properties of an agreement marker in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
Linguistics ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-25 , DOI: 10.1515/ling-2020-0159
Julia Krebs 1 , Ronnie B. Wilbur 2 , Dietmar Roehm 1
Affiliation  

Abstract This study focuses on the distribution of agrm-bc, one of two agreement markers used in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS; Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm. 2017. Two agreement markers in ÖGS. Sign Language and Linguistics 20(1). 27–54), with respect to different “verb types”. Using an online questionnaire, ÖGS signers rated ÖGS sentences involving different verb types that varied in whether they show agreement with their arguments (“agreeing” with two arguments, “plain” with none or only one) and if so, how (movement from subject to object, backwards from object to subject and/or facing towards object). Thus, the verbs differ in the degree and form of expressing agreement. In addition, these verbs either appeared with or without agrm-bc. Data analysis revealed that the combination of inflected agreeing verbs and the agreement marker (“double agreement”) is acceptable in ÖGS. If the verb itself does not indicate full agreement (i.e., as in plain verbs) agrm-bc can, but does not have to, be used to indicate the argument structure. Independently, whether the verb showed full agreement marking (movement and facing) or only facing did not influence the acceptability of the occurrence of agrm-bc. The relatively high ratings for the combination of agrm-bc with different verb types suggests that agrm-bc functions as a general agreement marker in ÖGS.

中文翻译:

奥地利手语(ÖGS)协议标记的分布特性

摘要这项研究着重于agrm-bc的分布,这是奥地利手语中使用的两个协议标记之一(ÖGS; Krebs,Julia,Ronnie B. Wilbur和Dietmar Roehm。2017。ÖGS中的两个协议标记。手语和语言学20 (1)。27-54),针对不同的“动词类型”。ÖGS签署人使用在线调查表对涉及不同动词类型的ÖGS句子进行了评分,这些句子的不同之处在于他们是否表示同意自己的论点(“同意”两个论点,“普通”不讨论或只有一个),以及如何(如何移出主语)到对象,从对象到对象的倒退和/或面向对象)。因此,动词在表达同意的程度和形式上有所不同。此外,这些动词带有或不带有agrm-bc都可以出现。数据分析显示,在ÖGS中,可以将变体的同意动词和同意标记(“双重同意”)组合使用。如果动词本身未表示完全一致(即,如普通动词中一样),则可以(但不一定)使用agrm-bc来指示自变量结构。独立地,动词显示完全一致的标记(运动和面对)还是仅面对并不影响agrm-bc发生的可接受性。agrm-bc与不同动词类型的组合的相对较高的评级表明,agrm-bc在ÖGS中充当了总体认同标记。动词显示完全一致的标记(运动和面对)还是仅面对不影响agrm-bc发生的可接受性。agrm-bc与不同动词类型的组合的相对较高的评级表明,agrm-bc在ÖGS中充当了总体认同标记。动词显示完全一致的标记(运动和面对)还是仅面对并不影响agrm-bc发生的可接受性。agrm-bc与不同动词类型的组合的相对较高的评级表明,agrm-bc在ÖGS中充当了总体认同标记。
更新日期:2020-10-25
down
wechat
bug