This squib presents novel data where the same correspondence is not observed. In the novel data, the original predicate cannot form part of the fragment in its ordinary meaning, posing a puzzle for the representation of the ellipsis site. The relevant data are described in sections 1 and 2. Section 3 then shows that the puzzle cannot be solved with reference to a nonisomorphic underlier in the ellipsis site. Section 4 offers a solution in two steps. First, an account based on accommodation of the lexical content of the ellipsis site is sketched (section 4.1). This proposal is shown to be untenable in structural accounts of ellipsis due to violations of syntactic and lexical identity (section 4.2), and it is replaced by an account in terms of metalinguistic reference (mixed quotation) in the ellipsis site (section 4.3). A quotation-based structural account is also suggested to be more parsimonious than a nonstructural account of the data.

中文翻译：

---

带有校正的片段

该爆管呈现了新颖的数据，其中未观察到相同的对应关系。在新颖的数据中，原始谓词无法以其普通含义形成片段的一部分，这给省略号站点的表示带来了困惑。相关数据在第1节和第2节中进行了描述。然后，第3节显示，不能根据省略号位置中的非同构下界来解谜。第4节分两个步骤提供解决方案。首先，根据省略号站点的词汇内容的适应性来描述一个帐户（第4.1节）。由于违反了句法和词汇同一性，该建议在省略的结构性说明中被证明是站不住脚的（第4.2节），并且在省略号站点中以语言学参考（混合引号）替换了该建议（第4.3节）。