当前位置: X-MOL 学术Linguistic Inquiry › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Scrambling Paradox
Linguistic Inquiry ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-23 , DOI: 10.1162/ling_a_00361
John Frederick Bailyn 1
Affiliation  

It has been commonly observed that scrambling and wh-movement share sensitivity to strong movement constraints (Webelhuth 1989, Saito 1992, Bailyn 1995). At the same time, the two processes clearly differ in certain other respects, such as wh-island sensitivity, a finding that has inspired a range of analyses of scrambling as entirely distinct from better-understood movement processes (Müller and Sternefeld 1993, Bošković and Takahashi 1998, among many others). Careful comparison of Ā-scrambling and overt wh-movement in a language that shows both (Russian) reveals that this seemingly paradoxical behavior can be captured effectively in a probe-goal theory of scrambling that obeys a form of Relativized Minimality defined across feature classes, following Rizzi 2004. The resulting analysis exposes the distinct nature of strong and weak islands, with consequences for our understanding of the core architecture of syntactic movement.

中文翻译:

争夺悖论

普遍观察到,加扰和动摇运动对强烈的运动约束具有共同的敏感性(Webelhuth 1989,Saito 1992,Bailyn 1995)。同时,这两个过程在某些其他方面也明显不同,例如对岛屿的敏感性,这一发现启发了一系列对加扰的分析,这与人们更好地理解的移动过程完全不同(Müllerand Sternefeld 1993,Boškovićand高桥(1998)等。在显示两种语言的俄语中对wh-扰码和明显的wh-动作进行仔细比较后发现,这种看似矛盾的行为可以在遵循目标要素定义的相对最小化形式的加扰的探测目标理论中有效地捕获,继Rizzi 2004之后。分析结果揭示了强弱岛屿的独特性质,
更新日期:2020-01-23
down
wechat
bug